Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ecampus.poltekkes-medan.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/3457
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohani Dewita-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-28T10:09:05Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-28T10:09:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-05-
dc.identifier.issn0038-111X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://poltekkes.aplikasi-akademik.com/xmlui/handle/123456789/3457-
dc.description.abstractThis research was conducted to compare the Circumcision techniques; the Electric Chauter and Smart Klamp. Circumcision is the act of cutting or removing part or all of the front cover skin from the penis. This action is a minor surgical procedure that is most often performed throughout the world, especially in men. This study took an investigation process of two different techniques of 60 patients in Klinik Super Sehat Medan of North Sumatra. Data obtained revealed that the patients with the Electric Chauter from first, second, third and the fourth day observation indicated the healing ratio reduction began from 5.23 to 1.63. On the other hand, Smart Klamp showed the reduction of healing ratio started from 4.73 to 2.44. It noted that healing process was almost similar, no significant difference. The obtained values of two distinguished techniques from day 1 to day 4 only ranged from 0.05 to 0.19. It concluded that t test value >0, 05. Clinics may prefer one of the two techniques Circuses; because there is no significant different between themen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSolid State Technologyen_US
dc.subjectElectric Chauteren_US
dc.subjectSmart Klampen_US
dc.subjectCircumcisionen_US
dc.titleComparative Techniques Between Electric Chauter and Smart Clamp Circumcisionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Koleksi Jurnal



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.